slickricks ([info]slickricks) wrote,

Draco

I've pretty much always known that J.K. Rowling is on the second tier (at best) of writers, but only just recently realized, after a little too much time, what exactly created the original allure of Harry Potter, and it is despicable. The first Harry Potter is an image of the Dream of the Coast (aka the jackpot expectation, as i've been ranting against as a consistent theme in this blog), in a fairly distilled form. Think about it; Harry is just an average kid who doesn't like his life with his aunt and uncle. However, Harry is promptly told that he is a Wizard, has magical powers to boot, has tons of money left to him from his parents, and is already famous in the Wizarding community. What more could a kid in Harry's position ask for? And what did Harry do to get there? Nothing. What effect has this story had on some wide-eyed children? Almost certainly built up the expectation and belief in those sorts of "miracles" happening. Granted, J.K. Rowling has Harry do lots of work to maintain his status from that point on, but the latter books deviate from that theme pretty significantly. Which isn't to say that they're better or worse for that deviation; she has to continue the story, after all, but i think the sense of wonder has been totally drained from the books, seeing as there's little to no mystery about any of the elements of the book, except that which Rowling makes deliberately, and without subtlety, confusing and mysterious. Take for example the fact that Dumbledore, once a cooky and aloof character now has regular interaction with all the characters; by simple virtue of the fact that Rowling has all that much more to write for Dumbledore, it's impossible for that character to remain nearly as good. Take Snape in the most recent installment for another example; by writing deliberately vaguely, Rowling beats you over the head with the fact that you don't know if he's a double-crosser, a triple-crosser, or what. It's just sorta pathetic how many holes she digs for herself, and how obvious it is that her ending will not be particularly satisfactory because she's given control of the story to the masses.

Ughh...I guess i can't be THAT upset at George R.R. Martin for working diligengtly to produce his next book, rather than nonchalantly putting out the next volume without thinking of the consequences of the events you've set up.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments

Anonymous

July 21 2005, 00:33:19 UTC 6 years ago

Hehe, i hate to destroy you and your ideal world, but come on hot dawg! I think that by now we should be over the depiction of nose to the grindstone hard-work in children stories. Don't tell me you'd rather us read nothing but Batman all day long. Snoreeeeeee. The reason that so many are attracted to the dream of the coast is that it's damn freaking exciting. I mean, who in their right mind would deny such a jackpot? Excitement happens to be a very key element in mass-appeal, and i wouldn't call that unjustified. But it's not the jackpot that is inherently evil, it is the dependence on them that can be sad. But Harry Potter is not depending on a jackpot. It has happened, it is an extraordinary story, and is thus recreated for us. Harry Potter is the story of what to do with a jackpot, not a means of acquiring one. Luckily, we don't have many stories that depict characters purchasing lottery tickets over and over until they win a lot of money and buy a motorboat. Then i'm on your side.

That said, clearly nothing is worth reading if you understand it already; nothing is worth doing if it bores you to death. This is why we all want to find what's on the other side of some horizon. Rowling is writing children's stories and isn't claiming to do anything but. While that can be annoying for people who have spent some time lost in art, we've gotta remember her audience here. This is not designed for enlightenment or to push the boundaries of what we label art; perhaps the more justified objection to Potter-frenzy is that so many adults are completely absolutely at its mercy hooked and waiting waiting waiting for this high-quality television-novel. The fact that it does model a certain ethical standard, and does so clearly and unambiguously, while remaining exciting enough to read (and teach others to!) is enough for me. After all, i'm not reading this as a character-study on traitors, i'm reading it to find out what side that bad bad Rickman is on.

P.S., if you haven't seen it, you absolutely MUST see American Movie: The Making Of Northwestern ASAP. Hopefully i'll get around to emailing Roth about it soon; he'd just love it... i think... hehehe so good ah yes.

[info]slickricks

July 21 2005, 01:41:47 UTC 6 years ago

Good point Chris, and i of course agree with what you've just said. I suppose it only makes me sad that THIS is the premier piece of literature that gets people like my brother to actually pick up a book every once in a while. If only art were more exciting. The only medium that i think is making any kind of real progress artistically is film, but even that's slowed to a crawl since the 90s. Ahhh, well....

[info]emoskapunk

July 22 2005, 01:07:47 UTC 6 years ago

Well Rickolai, I'd have to say it's not implicit in this one. Whatever our views on the American Dream's success rate are (those are implicit indeed), I'd say that it should be considered necessary and a positive to teach people to follow their dreams. Not only is it valuable that someone dreams to be an astronaut rather than everyone settle, but I think we need to teach people that it is possible. Sure, we should keep our children aware of their limitations at some point, we need for them to be able to dream. And, since I would see Harry Potter as a children's book, I'd rather not consider adults in this discussion, they are clearly the guests. Going along with what you said about Jay-Z, there are some people who make it and it's not ok to condemn people categorically by their race, gender, or socioeconomic status. I think we should teach people to do what they want and then slowly come to terms with the pragmatism of their intellectual and physical limitations as they arise in their life (i.e. sports teams or high schools) rather than shut them all down and leave them to settle as 4th graders. I know you agree with me deep down and the jackpot expectation should not be infinite or media driven, but kids need the ability to dream and be innocent. At least to some point...

As for the plot, I have no idea what you are talking about there. You are on your their. I'd never read the stuff.

[info]slickricks

July 23 2005, 22:00:24 UTC 6 years ago

Yeah, more and more, i've been thinking i was wrong about this one...I'm certainly man enough to admit my mistakes, and my frustration at Harry Potter was more likely frustration at the fact that THIS is the only book some people read each year. Instead of taking it out on people, i took it out on J.K. Rowling, who is by and large innocent of any serious mistakes.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…